Analyze any address for security threats, fraud indicators, and risk factors across supported blockchains.
Supported Address Types:
The API automatically detects the address type and returns relevant risk analysis. You do not need to use separate endpoints for different address types.
Selected chain. This includes 'eth', 'base', 'bsc', 'pol', 'opt', 'arb', 'sol', 'ton', 'sei', 'sui', 'btc', and 'stellar'.
eth, base, bsc, pol, opt, sol, arb, ton, sei, sui, btc, stellar Boolean to determine whether to show low risk issues or not
Boolean to determine whether to hide trust-related flags from the response
Comma-separated list of risk analysis modules to execute. Available modules control which specific risk analyses are performed. DEFAULT: All modules are analyzed for complete risk assessment. PERFORMANCE: Specify specific modules to filter results and improve response time. EXAMPLE: Use 'developer_migration' to analyze multi-platform token launch patterns for serial token creators.
Risk analysis modules. Each module analyzes specific risk categories: governance_analysis (contract ownership, upgradeability), token_security (freezeable, mintable, blacklist), contract_analysis (vulnerabilities), market_data (price, volatility), holder_analysis (token distribution), liquidity_analysis (pool data), fraud_detection (drainer, rugpull), sanctions_compliance (OFAC), mixer_detection (tornado cash), address_behavior (trading patterns), transaction_analysis (address poisoning), reputation_analysis (reported addresses), solana_specific (bundling, sniping), evm_specific (gas optimization), ton_specific (jetton standards), sui_specific (coin standards, object model), basic_info (address metadata), security_essentials (core security flags only), fund_flow_screening (simplified boolean indicators for fund flow risks including OFAC, hackers, mixers, drainers, FBI IC3, and Tornado Cash), developer_migration (multi-platform token launch analysis for detecting serial token creators and rugpull patterns across platforms like pump.fun and moonshot)
source_code_analysis, governance_analysis, token_security, contract_analysis, market_data, holder_analysis, liquidity_analysis, fraud_detection, sanctions_compliance, mixer_detection, address_behavior, transaction_analysis, reputation_analysis, solana_specific, evm_specific, ton_specific, sui_specific, basic_info, security_essentials, fund_flow_screening, developer_migration Success
Number of transactions
1
Number of medium risk transactions
1
Number of high risk transactions
0
Overall risk score
25.99
List of issues found
Detailed analysis information
Contextual information tags that are NOT security risks (e.g., paid DexScreener promotional info)
Legacy field indicating if the address has bytecode deployed (true) or is an EOA (false). For more detailed classification, use addressType. Note: May be true for EIP-7702 delegated EOAs that have bytecode but are functionally EOAs. Optional for chains without smart contracts (e.g., BTC).
false
Detailed classification of the address type. Indicates whether the address is an EOA, smart contract, token, contract wallet, or other chain-specific type. For EIP-7702 delegated EOAs, this will be 'EOA' even if bytecode exists. May be undefined if classification is unavailable.
CONTRACT, EOA, TOKEN, CONTRACT_WALLET, OBJECT, PACKAGE, DYNAMIC_FIELD, UNKNOWN Token standard classification if the address represents a token contract (e.g., ERC20, ERC721, SPL). Only populated for token addresses. May be undefined for non-token addresses or if standard cannot be determined.
ERC20, ERC1155, ERC721, SPL, NFT, JETTON, JETTON_WALLET, TONNFT, UNKNOWN, SUI_COIN, SUI_NFT, STELLAR_ASSET